WOW what a wordy article on quality.
Until reading this article I had not really thought of the different ways of measuring quality. I usually think about quality as gap quality or value quality as defined in the article.
I'm not sure where this article is meant to go or or its real purpose. It does give a good overview of the different quality definitions and there relationships to IT service, then recommends Gap and Value quality are best for measuring quality in IT TQM (total quality management).
The diagram used to model the solar system is defiantly not to scale but does give a interesting perspective on how to evaluate products and services and how the different factors affect each other.
Next is a discussion about a survey questionnaire they are going to use to test the survey questions for ambiguity, misunderstanding and vagueness of the terms used to them improve the questionnaire, there is no evidence or hows this went as this step is currently in progress at the time of publishing the article.Weird?
Maybe this article is way above me or I have no concertration\comprehension left in me after a busy day but the article doesn't seem to fit together and come to and definitive conclusion.
